1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner i.e. the Railway Recruitment Board, Gorakhpur is aggrieved by the order dated 14.12.2004 passed in O.A. No. 528 of 2004 by Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna (hereinafter to be referred to as the CAT). The challenge thrown by the petitioner to the impugned order of the CAT is based on the fact that the private respondent, Meena Kumari, did not have the requisite qualification to be appointed as a Teacher on the post of P.G.T. (Home Science), but despite the accepted position, the CAT has directed them to issue a letter of appointment in her favour within the specified time indicated in the order.

3. The Railway Recruitment Board through its Chairman, Gorakhpur invited applications for appointment of qualified candidates for the post of P.G.T. Teachers for the Railway Schools operating under them. The recruitments were to be effected on various post like Home Science, English, Maths, Sanskrit etc. In this regard advertisements were issued as per employment notice dated 29.3.2003 in Employment News, Rojgar Samachar and various local daily newspapers.

4. In the advertisement dated 29.3.2003 of the "Em