SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Pat) 1478

S.K.KATRIAR
Brahmdeo Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Heard in part.

2. Mr. S.S.P. Yadav for the petitioner, and Mr. Sunil Kumar Karn, learned junior counsel to Additional Advocate General No. VI, for the respondents are present.

3. The petitioner claims salary as a Dresser from the date of his joining at Biraul in March/April 1992 till 11.6.1996. He joined at Singhwara on 12.6.1996, and is being paid salary. After elaborate submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner consuming a lot of time, the learned Government counsel commenced his submissions in opposition to the writ petition. He placed reliance on the supplementary counter affidavit filed by respondent nos. 6 and 7 which has been sworn by Anil Kumar Thakur, Incharge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Singhwara, on 31.8.2007. The respondent authorities have already placed on record two counter affidavits earlier. The supplementary counter affidavit does not place on record the documents in support of the statements made therein, and the deponent tends to confront this Court with his conclusions. It also does not deal with the documents relied on by the petitioner marked Annexures 1, 4, 6, 9 and 11 etc. In case of a dispute, the concerned authority is duty b





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top