NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
Ram Babu Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Bank Of India – Respondent
1. Heard
2. The petitioner had approached the respondent-bank, which bank is a nationalized bank for grant of agricultural loan to purchase a tractor. The petitioner was granted loan of Rs. 3 lakh under an agreement duly executed. The tractor, as per the said agreement was hypothecated to the bank. The agreement has been annexed as Annexure A to the counter affidavit by the respondent-Bank. The agreement was executed on 19.8.2004. The petitioner admittedly defaulted in liquidating the loan. The liability increased substantially. When the liability increased to Rs. 3,95,000/- and the petitioner made no efforts to liquidate the same, the bank took possession of the hypothecated tractor. Possession having been taken, still the petitioner was unable to liquidate the dues. Bank then advertised for sale of the tractor. Tractor has since been sold and transferred to the purchaser. This allegedly highhanded action of the respondent-bank is questioned by way of this writ application.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner is an agriculturist and due to various reasons he was unable to pay and/or liquidate the dues. It is submitted that even though admittedly he was in substantial de
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.