1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned counsel for the Bihar Hindu Religious Trust Board (hereinafter referred to as the "Board" for the sake of brevity) as well as learned counsel for the private respondents in both the aforesaid miscellaneous appeals which have been heard together and are being decided by this common order.

2. I.A. No. 32 of 2007 has been filed by the appellants in M.A. No. 10 of 2007, which is barred by the Law of Limitation, for condoning less than a months delay in the filing of the said miscellaneous appeal. Considering the averments made by learned counsel for the appellants and the statements made in the interlocutory application, it appears that sufficient cause has been shown for condoning the delay in the filing of the said miscellaneous appeal. Accordingly, I.A. No. 32 of 2007 is allowed and the delay in the filing of the said miscellaneous appeal is condoned.

3. M.A. No. 386 of 2006 has been filed by the plaintiffs challenging order dated 7.9.2006 by which the learned Subordinate Judge 1st Court, Katihar refused to grant ad interim injunction in favour of the plaintiffs for restraining the defendants from interfering with the plai