DHARNIDHAR JHA
Dinesh Parwat – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
1. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj disposed of the prayer for bail of O.P. No. 2 Rajesh Giri who surrendered before him in connection with Keteya P.S. case No. 92 of 2006 under Sections 307 etc. of the Indian Penal Code by rejecting prayer for bail. The O.P. No. 2 filed B. P. No. 963 of 2006 on the same day of rejection of his prayer by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, i.e. on 20-9-2006. The learned Sessions Judge, Gopalganj directed the petition to be put up before him on the same day, i.e. 20-9-2006 and after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor directed the release of O.P. No. 2 on bail. The informant of the case, i.e. the petitioner Dinesh Parwat felt aggrieved by the above order and filed the present criminal miscellaneous petition with a prayer to cancel the order of bail passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Gopalganj.
2. The fact of the case was that in an occurrence dated 31-5-2006 all the accused persons came into the orchard situated in front of the house of the informant-petitioner Dinesh Parwat and started abusing him. The accused persons surrounded the petitioner and accused Rajendra Giri ordered to kill him u
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.