SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Pat) 784

S.K.SINHA
Ranjeet Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Heard Ms. Shashi Priya Pathak, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Shyam Kishore Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the State.

2. Through this writ application, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the letter no. 37 dated 2.12.2006, whereby and whereunder the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Panchayat Sikshak has been cancelled. ,

3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that after going through the requisite selection process, the petitioner was appointed as Panchayat Sikshak as per letter no. 27 dated 30th November, 2006, as contained in Annexure-4 to the writ application, and pursuant to the same the petitioner joined on the said post on 7th of December 2006 before the Principal, Primary School, Sathiyari, who duly accepted his joining.

4. It is further submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the cancellation of the appointment of the petitioner on the ground that he did not possess the requisite qualification of passing of Intermediate Examination, is absolutely untenable as it is not in dispute that the petitioner obtained the certificate of passing of the Intermediat






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top