1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 1.5.2004 passed by the 1st Sub-ordinate Judge, Munger in T.S. No. 142/2003 under which he has granted injunction restraining the appellants and other defendants from interfering with the possession of the plaintiff (respondent no. 1) over the suit property.

2. Learned counsel for the parties were heard.

3. The case of the plaintiff (respondent no.1), in brief, is that she had acquired the suit property and the land mentioned in Schedule I of the plaint through a registered sale deed dated 4.8.1961 and after purchase came in possession. She thereafter sold the Schedule I property to Sri Sitaram Jee and gave possession to the deity. Defendant No.1 (respondent No. 2), the younger brother of her husband, was not in good terms with her husband after the death of her mother. He executed 21 sale deeds of the suit land in favour of the other defendants (appellants and other respondents) and they are making preparation to take forceful possession on the basis of sale deeds. The contention of the plaintiff, hence, is that she has a good prima facie case for temporary injunction and the balance of convenience is in her favour and she