SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Pat) 1109

CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD
Lalit Prasad Sah – Appellant
Versus
Mahendra Sah – Respondent


Judgment

Chandramauli Kr.Prasad, J.

1. Petitioners-objectors, aggrieved by the order dated 21.2.2004 passed by the Munsif, 1st, Munger in Title Execution Case No. 18 of 1976 directing for issuance of delivery of possession and for deputation of police force, have preferred this application.

2. Decree-holders-opposite party nos. 1 and 2 filed application for execution of the decree of ejectment dated 31.1.1972 passed in Title Suit No. 184 of 1970. Said suit was filed impleading Musahru Sah, uncle of these petitioners, on the ground of default of arrears of rent, which was decreed. Miscellaneous case, filed by said Musahru Sah for setting aside the ex parte decree was dismissed so also the appeal i.e. Misc. Appeal No. 3 of 1973.

3. Petitioners filed Title Suit No. 104 of 1974 for declaration of their title and further, for a declaration that the decree passed in Title Suit No. 184 of 1970, is collusive and not binding on them. The decree-holder, put the decree for execution which was registered as Execution Case No. 18 of 1976. It seems that the petitioners father Banarsi Sah had also objected to the execution of the decree, which led to registration of Misc. Case No. 1 of 1978. Munsi













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top