1. In all these writ applications petitioners are claiming for their selection as Anganbari Sewika/Sahaika or challenging the order cancelling their selection by the respondents. Petitioners have also challenged the procedure adopted for selection/removal of Anganbari Sewika/Sahaika on the ground that in violation of the guidelines of the Government, selection/removal orders have been passed. Almost in all cases petitioners have stated that their representations filed before the Collector or the D.D.C. is pending for long and not being considered. In some of the writ applications petitioners have challenged the procedure adopted for selection of Anganbari Sewika/Sahaika. In some of the cases selection of the petitioners have been rejected by the respondents considering representation filed before the Collector or the D.D.C. In sum and substance all matters relate to selection as Anganbari Sewika/Sahaika.

2. Allegations in almost all the writ applications are similar that in selection/ removal guideline of the Welfare Department contained in Memo no. 1129 dated 13.6.1998, Memo no. 32 dated 29.9.2001 or the guideline contained in Memo no. 427 dated 20.6.2003 have not been fol