SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Pat) 850

PATNA HIGH COURT
Chandramauli Kumar Prasad and Abhijit Sinha JJ.
State Of Bihar
Versus
Jhari Sharma, Kailash Singh And Rana Singh
Death Reference No. 3 of 2004 ;
Criminal Appeal No. 92 of 2004 ;
Decided On : APRIL 30, 2007

Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860-Sections 148, 302/149 and 201-Accused persons with firearms surrounding the deceased as well as others and resorting to firing-Four persons killed-Body of three deceased carried away on tractor and thrown into the river, subsequently recovered-Presence of huge quantity of blood and the cartridges at the P.O. and the consistent evidence of witnesses establish the occurrence-Indiscriminate firing resulting in the death of four persons-Merely because the number of persons killed is not equal to number of shots fired does not mean that accused persons not resorted to firing. (Paras 35, 39)

       Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973-Sections 157, 165 and 173-lnvestigation-failure on the part of I.O. to seize the chairs present at the P.O.-Mere irregularity in investigation is not sufficient to discard the prosecution case. (Para 43)

       Criminal Trial-Examination of witnesses-Non-examination of the driver of the truck carrying the dead bodies and also of other persons present at the P.O. not fatal-It is not the quantity but quality of the evidence which is decisive- The case of the prosecution shall rest on the evidence on record and not on the basis of the testimony of such witnesses who ought to have been examined. (Para 45)

       Indian Penal Code, 1860-Section 302-Murder-ldentification of dead bodies-The person identifying the dead bodies not examined-It is evident from the evidence of eye witnesses that deceased were murdered and were taken away on tractor-No cross-examination regarding identification of dead bodies-Non-examination of the person identifying dead bodies will not make the identification doubtful. (Para 47)

       Indian Penal Code, 1860-Section 302-Murder trial-Two of the appellants not named in the F.I.R. though they were known to the informant and were residents of the same village-The F.I.R. Is not an encyclopedia but these appellants being known to the informant and witnesses to the fardbeyan from before being the residents of the same village and there being no reason of their joining the accused persons, such omission is vital and renders their participation in the crime doubtful-Further, nothing on record to suggest that appellant awarded with death sentence shall be a menace to the society and cannot be rehabilitated and shall be a continuing threat to the society-Not a rarest of rare cases-His sentence of death reduced to R.I. for actual 20 years and other two appellants acquitted. (Paras 58 to 62)

       (2003) SCC (Cri) 1414, (2002) 2 SCC 35-Referred to.

       

Judgment

Chandramauli Kr.Prasad, J.

1. Jhari Sharma, Kailash Singh and Rana Singh were put on trial for commission of the offence under Sec.148, 302/149 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and 27(1) of the Arms Act. Additional Sessions Judge. Fast Track Court No. II. Khagaria by judgment dated 29th of January, 2004 passed in Sessions Trial No. 351 of 1999 held all of them quilty under Sec.148, 302/149 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and 27(1) of the Arms Act. By order dated 30.1.2004 he awarded sentence of 2 years rigorous imprisonment for offence under Sec.148 of the Indian Penal Code, death for offence under Sec.302/149 of the Indian Penal Code, 5 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 5000/-, in default of payment of fine to suffer simple imprisonment for one year under Sec.201 of the Indian Penal Code and further sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and fine of Rs. 3000/-, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 6 months under Sec.27(1) of the Arms Act. Sentences of imprisonment were directed to run concurrently.

2. The sentence of death had necessitated reference under Sec.366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and, accordingly the learned Judge has transmitted the record to this Court for confirmation of death sentence, which has been registered as Death Reference No. 3 of 2004. Kailash Sinha and Rana Singh aggrieved by their conviction and sentence have also preferred appeal, which has been registered as Criminal Appeal No. 92 of 2004, whereas the Criminal appeal preferred by Jhari Sharma has given rise to Criminal Appeal No. 105 of 2004.

3. As the Death Reference as also the Criminal appeals have arisen out of the same judgment, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

4. Prosecution started on the basis of a statement given by one Suresh Singh (P.W.8) before the Sub-Inspector of Police of Beldaur Police Station on 21.5.1998 at 7.30 A.M. at Ramnagar Bazar Samiti, Maheshkhoont. According to the informant, fee of the Bazar Samiti is realised in the name of his son. On the date of occurrence at 6 A.M. he alongwith his sons Sunil Singh (P.W.4), Shambhu Singh (P.W.6), brothers Sudhakar Singh (deceased), Sudhir Singh (P.W.1), nephew Jitendra Singh (deceased), Bijay Kumar Singh (P.W.2), Ranjeet Kumar Singh (P.W.5) and few others including a man from Bhagalpur, whose name was not known to him, were sitting inside the room of the Bazar Samiti and on chair outside it. According to him, Sudhakar Singh (deceased), Ram Briksh Singh (deceased) and Jitendra Singh (deceased) were sitting outside and at that time Kushweri Choudhary @ Kishori Choudhary besides fourteen other accused persons including appellant Jhari Sharma but excluding appellants Kailash Singh and Rana Singh came suddenly from eastern side and at the same time ten other persons came from western side armed with weapons like rifle, gun, pistol and musket and surrounded them. According to the informant, accused Kishori Choudhary and Mangal Singh killed Sudhakar Singh at that very place by fire arm and rest of the accused persons resorted to indiscriminate firing causing death of Ram Briksh Singh and another person. On hearing the sound of firing and hulla, many people gathered and accused Kishori Choudhary and others asked Nageshwar Singh at gun point to start his tractor and after putting the dead bodies of three persons, namely, Sudhakar Singh, Ram Briksh Singh and the unknown person fled towards Gawas river in the west. After accused Kishori Choudhary and other accused persons left the place of occurrence villagers gathered and the informant saw Jitendra Singh living in injured condition in a maize field situated behind the Bazar Samiti who was sent to Khagaria Hospital for treatment. According to the informant, accused Kishori Choudhary fired about 25 shots and the reason of the occurrence is that said Kishori Choudhary and other accused persons are criminals and had enmity with deceased Sudhakar Singh f






































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top