SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Pat) 948

BARIN GHOSH, NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
Nitya Gopal Bandyopadhyay – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. The admitted facts of this case are that in 1966 when the appellant acquired Masters degree in Ayurvedic he was occupying a teaching post though not in the Ayurvedic College, Patna. On 30th January, 1970 the appellant was appointed as Lecturer in the Government Ayurvedic College, Patna. On 1st July, 1970 an advertisement was published inviting applications for filling up the post of Principal of the said College. This advertisement was followed by yet another advertisement published on 16th December, 1972. These advertisements required postraduation in Ayurvedic, ten years teaching experience and five years administrative experience as basic qualifications for being eligible to respond to the said advertisement. It appears that on 2nd June, 1973 recommendation was made in favour of seven persons for being selected for the post of Principal of the said College. Appellant was one of those recommendees. It appears that one Sri Shrikant Sharma was qne of those recommendees. It also appears that Sri Shrikant Sharma was appointed as Principal of the said College. Sri Shrikant Sharma was to attain his age of superannuation on 31st January, 1984. It further appears that by a let


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top