SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Pat) 566

SHEEMA ALI KHAN, CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD
Mohan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Chandramauli Kr.Prasad, J.

1. Writ petitioner-appellant aggrieved by the order dated 18.1.2008 passed by a learned Single Judge in CWJC No. 15762 of 2007 dismissing the writ application has preferred this appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent.

2. Shorn of unnecessary details, facts giving rise to the present application are that Bihar Staff Selection Commission issued advertisement inviting applications for appointment to the post of Sub-Inspector of Police. Said advertisement was published in various newspapers including the daily newspaper "Hindustan" in its issue dated 21.09.2004. It is an admitted position that for appointment to the post of Sub-Inspector of Police, before a candidate is allowed to appear in the written test, he had to undergo physical test and only after succeeding in the said test he appears in the written test. The physical test is held at Range level and there are twelve Range Boards, all over the State for the purpose. It is further also not in dispute that the writ petitioner- appellant, hereinafter referred to as the petitioner, applied for consideration of his case before the Deputy Inspector General of two different Range Boards, namely,














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top