SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Pat) 693

R.M.LODHA, CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD
Om Prakash Dhanuka – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

1. By this writ application in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, petitioner has prayed for direction to the Central Government and its functionaries more particularly the respondent nos. 1 and 2 to formulate an Industrial package containing concessions and incentives for the existing Industries and other incentive package to such Industrialist who intend to set up new industries in the State on the line of similar packages offered to the States of Uttaranchal, Himachal Pradesh etc.

2. Petitioner has sought to make out a case that the parameters prescribed by the Government of India for such incentive packages are fully met by the State of Bihar and cannot be treated in a different and discriminatory manner by the Union of India.

3. The Central Government has filed its counter affidavit and set out the reasons as to why State of Bihar does not fit in the category of incentive packages and incentives for promoting the industries which has been given to few States like State of Jammu & Kashmir, Uttaranchal and Himachal Pradesh.

4. Principally, it is stated that rationale for extending concessions and incentives for promoting the industries in the State inter alia, incl








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top