Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.

1. Heard the parties.

The instant revision application is directed against the order dated 25.5.2007 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jamui in Case No. l9M/2004 whereby he directed petitioner to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 300/-per month to the minor son of O.P. No. 2 from the date of order, on her application under Section 125 Cr.P.C.

2. The opposite party No. 2, Zinnat Pravin, in her petition under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. stated that she was married with petitioner in May,2001 and her husband and in-laws kept her well for ten days but thereafter they began to torture her. She, however, remained in her Sasural for five months with a hope that torture would end. In the mean time she became pregnant. But as torture continued unabated she was forced to take shelter at her parents place. At her naihar she gave birth to a male child from her wed lock with petitioner. However, she admitted the factum of divorce.

3. The petitioner entered appearance and filed his written statement. In his written statement he claimed that he has already divorced petitioner on 4.5.2002 by post and on 15.7.2002 through registered deed of Talaknamahe