SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Pat) 127

V.N.SINHA
Pinki Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

V.N.Sinha, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Petitioner clains herself to be the registered owner of the vehicle, bearing Registration No. BR 33A- 8201, which was initially the subject matter of a hire purchase agreement dated 1.9.2001 executed by and between M/s Shrachi Securities Ltd. through its Managing Director, Respondent No.8 and Smt. Ranjana Poddar, Respondent No.10.

3. It is submitted on her behalf that she purchased the vehicle from Respondent no. 10 under sale letter dated 11.9.2006, Annexure-1 for Rs. 1,01,000/- as prior thereto hire purchase agreement stood terminated as would appear from the no objection certificate dated 24.9.2004, Annexure-2 to this application issued by the financier in favour of the hirer/ first registered owner of the vehicle in question on the basis of which and the sale letter, the transport authorities even transferred and registered the vehicle in the name of the petitioner as would be evident from the endorsement made in the owner book of the vehicle, which is contained in Annexure-3 to this application the relevant entry is dated 18.10.2006 at page 19 of the brief. It is also submitted that on the basis of the aforesai







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top