SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Pat) 281

BARIN GHOSH, RAJESH BALIA
Bihar Public Service – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The appeal is against the order of learned single Judge dated 10.12.2007 allowing the petition filed by respondent no. 2.

3. In pursuance of the advertisement dated 13th of April, 2005 the petitioner-respondent no. 2 appeared for the preliminary test and having cleared the preliminary test vide the result declared as per Annexure-1 the petitioner-respondent no. 2 entered the second phase of selection for the post of Child Development Project Officer, in all 107 posts were advertised. Thereafter, the petitioner-respondent no. 2 was admitted to main examination in pursuance of advertisement, Annexure-2. The petitioner-respondent no. 2 had laid claim to the reserved posts for Other Backward Classes (Category 0-5 ) and she had been called for interview to be held between 10th of September to 15.09.2007. Petitioner-respondents interview took place on 12.09.2007. For considering the candidature against the post reserved for Other Backward Classes/ Extremely Backward Classes, as per advertisement the concerned candidate must have a certificate issued either by the District Magistrate or countersigned by him or issued by the Additional C














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top