MIHIR KUMAR JHA
Indradeo Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
1. In this writ application the petitioner had initially sought for a direction commanding the respondents to make payment of his post retirement benefit i.e. pension, gratuity, unutilised earned leave etc. on the basis that he had retired as Assistant Teacher on 31.7.2001 from the office of the Block Education Extension Officer, Ghosi (South). In the main writ application, further prayer had been made to for a direction for payment of salary to the petitioner for the period 7.7.1995 to 31.7.2001 after deducting the amount of subsistence allowance already paid to him.
2. During the pendency of the writ appiication the petitioner has filed i.A. No. 4270/07 wherein a prayer has been made to quash the order dated. 22.3.2006 whereby and whereunder the claim of the petitioner for grant of post retirement benefit has been rejected on the ground that the petitioner was a convicted person and was thus not entitled for payment of post retirement benefit. The respondent-District Superintendent of Education, Jehanabad in the impugned order, however, has directed for payment of amount of provident fund, group insurance as also difference of salary for the period 1.1.1971 to 31.3.1973.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.