SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Pat) 1436

R.M.LODHA, KISHORE K.MANDAL
Sanjay Bhagat – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. The petitioner has approached this Court for his release, as according to him, his custody is illegal being in contravention of Section 309(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2. The petitioner is an accused in a criminal case being Dumra P.S. Case No. 61 of 2008 for the offences punishable under Sections 366 and 366-A of the Indian Penal Code. He was arrested by the police on 07th April, 2008. He was produced before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi on that date. Thereafter, the petitioner alleges that he has not been produced in the Court. It transpires that the Investigating Officer, upon completion of investigation, on 23rd May, 2008 submitted charge sheet against the petitioner. On the day of submission of charge sheet, the petitioner not produced before the Court nor the Court has taken cognizance of charge sheet.

3. It appears to us that after submission of charge sheet without taking cognizance, the judicial custody of the petitioner is rendered illegal. This is supported by Division Bench decision of this Court in the case of Pawan Kumar Jaiswal Vs. The State of Bihar, 1999 (1) PCCR 370, wherein this Court observed thus:

"4. On these fact









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top