SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Pat) 1479

SHEEMA ALI KHAN
Kartik Mandal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. This appeal arises from a judgment and decree, dated 24-8-1974 passed in Title Suit No. 178/124 of 1968/ 1974 by the 3rd Additional Subordinate Judge, Bhagalpur.

2. By the aforesaid judgment and decree the trial Court has held that the plaintiffs do not have occupancy right with respect to the suit land.

3. The suit was filed for declaration that I the plaintiffs are the raiyats of the suit lands J and have got occupancy right thereon and the defendant, i.e. State of Bihar has no right to make settlement of the suit land and, if ! any, such settlement is made, it will be in violation of the provisions of law.

4. The lands in question appertain to khesraNos. 12, 13, 14 and 15of khata No. 4 situated in Mauza Asanandpur, Thana No. I I I and measure 6, 7 acres and land of khesra No. 12, khata No. 5 situated in Mauza Dharrnpur Mills measuring 3 acres. The lands have been described in the records of right as Ghair Mazrua Mokaridar, the Collector of Bhagalpur under the Thakurs of Barari who were the proprietors.

5. The plaintiffs case is that they were in possession over the lands for more than fifty years on the basis of successive settlements made with them from time to time



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top