SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Pat) 1484

SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH
Vijay Kumar Choudhary @ Vijay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. In the instant writ petition, the petitioner prays for a direction to the respondent authorities to provide security guards with carbine alongwith section of security guards to be deployed at his residence for protection of his life and property.

2. The petitioner seeks the aforesaid reliefs, as he apprehends imminent threat to his life and property at the hands of anti-social elements having connection with high ups and politicians, whose misdeeds were exposed in public by him. It would be necessary to notice the facts of the case in brief.

3. The petitioner prior to the year 2002, was a staff reporter of Delhi Newspaper Hindustan, Patna Edition, in course of his career as a journalist he made some sensational revelations regarding the misdeeds of some high ups and political bigwigs. The petitioner began to receive continuous threats from anti-social elements who was affected by such newspaper report.

4. The authorities on realizing that threat perception to petitioner is imminent and real, the Additional Secretary (Home) Police, Bihar and the D.G.P. recommended to provide adequate security arrangement for him. Similarly the D.I.G., Central Zone, Patna also accepted the





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top