NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
Abdul Rauf @ Sri Md. Abdul Rauf – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
1. The petitioners are retail licensee under the provisions of the Bihar Trade Articles Licenses Unification Order, 1984 framed and issued under the provisions of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The Licensing Authority under the aforesaid Order is the Sub-Divisional Officer. Petitioners as a retail dealer are also functioning as a dealer under the public distribution system.
It appears that an inspection was conducted at the petitioners premises and certain irregularities were found. Ultimately, the licenses of the petitioners have been cancelled and the order of cancellation is Annexure-6, under the signature of the Licensing Authority, who is the Sub-Divisional Officer, Araria.
2. At the first instance, this Court felt that it was the matter that the petitioners who ought to have been adjudicated in appeal, an appeal lay from such an order. But, Mr. N.K. Agarwal, learned Senior Counsel appearing in support of the writ petitions drew my attention to a complete order sheet of the case, which is contained in Annexure-5. Now, perused the order sheet.
I am afraid, it depicts a very sorry state of affairs, it is too fate in the day to urge that the power being exercised by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.