SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Pat) 909

GHANSHYAM PRASAD, R.M.LODHA
Bishnudhari Paswan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. The appeal is admitted.

2. Mr. D.N.Yadav, AAG 6, waives service for respondents 1 to 9.

3. Looking to the controversy raised in the appeal, it is heard and disposed of at this stage itself.

4. The State counsel does not dispute that the appellant was suspended by an order dated 25th July, 2007. He also does not dispute that there is no criminal proceedings pending against the appellant nor the appellant was suspended because of the pendency of any criminal case.

5. In view of the facts admitted by the State counsel, Rule 9 (7) of the Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005 reads thus:

"NILAMBANADES KE NIRGAT HONE KI TITHI SE TEEN MAH KE BHITAR AROP PATRA GATITH KAR DIYA JAYEGA JISEKE NAHI HONE PER TEEN MAH KI SAMAPTI PER NILAMBANADES WAPAS LIYA JAYEGA JAB TAK KI NILAMBANADAS NIRGAT KARENAWALA PRADHIKAR AAROP PATRA KE GATITH KIYE JANE MEIN BILAMBH KE KARNO KO ABHILIKHITH KARETE HUYE AGLE CHAR MAH TAK KE LIYA NILAMBAN KO NAWIKIRT KARENE SAMBANDHI AADESH PARIT NA KARE;

PARANTU YAH KI BISTARITH CHAR MAH KI AwADHI KI SAMAPTI KE PASCHAT YADI AROP PATRA GATITH NAHI KIYA JATA HAI JO NILAMBANADESH SWATAH WAPAS LE LIYA GAYA SAMAJHA JAYEGA."

6. Th



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top