2008 Supreme(Pat) 1026
PATNA HIGH COURT
Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.
Jay Mangal Singh
Versus
Bihar State Co Operative Bank Ltd.
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1263 of 2008 ;
Decided On : JULY 28, 2008
The main legal principle established is that under the Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, the office bearers of a cooperative society, such as the Secretary, cannot be held personally liable for the cooperative's debts, unless they have specifically underwritten or guaranteed the repayment of the loan.
Headnote:
Liability - Co-operative Societies Act - Personal Liability of Secretary
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, as the Secretary of a cooperative society, was made a party to certificate proceedings for the recovery of outstanding dues owed by the cooperative to a bank. The petitioner challenged the proceedings, arguing that as an office bearer of the cooperative, he cannot be personally liable for the cooperative's debts.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the certificate proceedings against the petitioner could not be sustained under the provisions of the Bihar Co-operative Societies Act. It held that a cooperative is a separate legal entity from its members and office bearers, and the loan taken by the cooperative cannot be recovered from the petitioner, especially since he was being proceeded against solely due to his position as the elected Secretary of the cooperative.
Issues: The issue was whether the Secretary of a cooperative society could be held personally liable for the cooperative's debts, even if he did not underwrite or guarantee the repayment of the loan.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, which established the separate legal identity of a cooperative from its members and office bearers. It emphasized that the petitioner had no personal liability in the matter, except to the extent he may be liable for any loan or advances taken and remaining unpaid from his cooperative, which was not the case in this instance.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the certificate proceedings against the petitioner, and held that he could not be proceeded against for the cooperative's debts.
1. Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner Jay Mangal Singh was at the relevant time Secretary of the Ajanta Tel Utpadak Sahyog Samiti Limited, duly registered under the Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, 1935 . The Co-operative had taken a loan from Central Co-operative Bank Limited, Aurangabad. Having taken loan, it defaulted in repayment, the consequences, thereof, was that for recovery of outstanding dues a certificate proceeding was initiated against the said Co-operative. While doing so, petitioner was made a party to the certificate proceeding and shown as a certificate debtor. This was done specifically mentioning that the petitioner was the Secretary of the said Co-operative when the loan was granted.
3. The Co-operative challenged the proceedings before this Court in the earlier writ petition, which was dismissed. Petitioner has now challenged the proceedings as against him and has submitted that being a Secretary and merely an office bearer of the Co-operative he cannot be made personally liable for the dues incurred by the Cooperative. The loan was neither sanctioned to the petitioner nor taken by the petitioner. The petitioner had neither underwritten the loan nor guaranteed its repayment. He was merely Secretary of the Cooperative, which cannot visit him with personal liability.
4. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the Central Co-operative Bank submits that loan having been taken by the Cooperative under the Secretaryship of the petitioner, petitioner would be accountable someone had to repay the loan.
5. Having heard the parties and considered the matter, in my view, the certificate proceedings as against the writ petitioner cannot be sustained under the provisions of the Bihar Co-operative Societies Act. A Co-operative is a body incorporate and an independent juristic entity. That being so, it is distinct from not only its member but members elected as office bearers. This distinction as between the Co-operative and its constituents is to well establish for any further discussion on the matter. That being so, the loan having been taken by the Cooperative, it cannot be recovered from the petitioner. Especially, as petitioner is being proceeded against only because he happen to be the elected Secretary of the Co-operative. He is not being proceeded against on the ground of having underwritten or guaranteed the repayment of loan. He has no personal liability in the matter, except, to the extent he may be liable for any loan or advances taken and remaining unpaid from his Co-operative. That is not the case of the respondents. That being so, the certificate proceedings as against the petitioner cannot be sustained and are wholly without jurisdiction. Petitioner cannot be proceeded against. The certificate proceedings to that extent as pending before District Co-operative Officer, Aurangabad shall stand quashed. The writ petition is allowed to the extent, as indicated above.