SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Pat) 856

BARIN GHOSH, JAYANANDAN SINGH
State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Parmeshwari Devi – Respondent


Judgment

BARIN GHOSH and JAYANANDAN SINGH JJ.

1. A full Bench of this Court has very recently pronounced that there is no impediment in recovering excess payment made to a Government employee by mistake. However, the Full Bench has decided if payment has been made on the basis of an understanding but subsequently by application of mind, it transpires that the basis was a wrong basis, then payment made on the wrong basis cannot be said to be payment made by mistake and accordingly, cannot be recovered.

2. In the writ petition, the original writ petitioner challenged an order dated 28.07.1998, whereby and under it was contended that during the period between 5th February, 1983 and 31.12.1997, the original petitioner was paid an excess amount of Rs. 1,49,805.80 and accordingly, the said sum of money is recoverable from him. It was stated that although the original petitioner did not pass the noting and drafting examination, he was accorded increments during the period mentioned above and as such excess payment had been made.

3. In the Boards Miscellaneous Rules, there is a direction for passing Hindi noting and drafting examination to earn eligibility for obtaining increments. The said

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top