SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Pat) 870

V.N.SINHA
Krishandeo Passwan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. None appears for the Dehri Dalmianagar Municipal Board, although two separate counter affidavits have been filed on behalf of Respondent No. 5 and Respondent Nos. 6 to 9, the authorities of the Municipality.

3. Petitioner at the relevant time was serving as Head Clerk, Accountant and Tax Daroga of the Municipality. He was made accused in a trap case and was also taken in custody by the Cabinet Vigilance Bureau, which case is still under investigation but petitioner has been released on bail by this Court under orders dated 4.1.2008 as contained in Annexure-3 to this application, whereafter he has been placed under suspension under order bearing Memo No. 7(c) dated 19.1.2008 as contained in Annexure-1, which is impugned in this writ application.

4. From the counter affidavit filed on behalf of Respondent Nos. 6 to 9 it appears that the charges have already been framed in the proceeding and the charge- sheet is dated 21.1.2008 and was served on the petitioner alongwith the letter of the Executive Officer of the Municipality bearing Memo No. 34 dated 21.1.2008 contained in Annexures-F and G to the counter affidavit.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top