KISHORE K.MANDAL, R.M.LODHA
Nahida Parveen – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
1. Nahida Parveen is the petitioner before us. She is daughter of Mukhtar Ansari (respondent no. 6). She claims to have married Md. Sahrukh on 29th of May, 2008 in accordance with musiims rites. Her father lodged the first information report being P.S. Case No. 225 of 2008 at Police Station Bhabhua on 10th June, 2008 alleging that one lady wife of Md. Sabbir, resident of Ward No. 16 came to his house on 27th of May, 2008 at about 9 A.M. and took his daughter Nahida Parveen (aged about 14-15 years) on the pretext that some guests were to come to her house. When she did not return until evening, he went to Sabbirs house. At that time, Sabbirs wife told him that she had already left Nahida Parveen about half an hour back. He kept on searching his daughter, but failed. Then he came to know that Md. Sahrukh son of Md. Sabbir after abducting his daughter intended to marry her. Based on the said first information report, a criminal case under Section 366A read with Section 34 IPC was registered against Md. Sabbir, Md. Sahrukh, Md. Yusuf, Md. Sajid, Ramjan Ansari and the wife of Md. Sabbir.
2. During the course of investigation, Nahida Parveen was produced before the Court of Judic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.