SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Pat) 1146

KISHORE K.MANDAL, R.M.LODHA
Nahida Parveen – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Nahida Parveen is the petitioner before us. She is daughter of Mukhtar Ansari (respondent no. 6). She claims to have married Md. Sahrukh on 29th of May, 2008 in accordance with musiims rites. Her father lodged the first information report being P.S. Case No. 225 of 2008 at Police Station Bhabhua on 10th June, 2008 alleging that one lady wife of Md. Sabbir, resident of Ward No. 16 came to his house on 27th of May, 2008 at about 9 A.M. and took his daughter Nahida Parveen (aged about 14-15 years) on the pretext that some guests were to come to her house. When she did not return until evening, he went to Sabbirs house. At that time, Sabbirs wife told him that she had already left Nahida Parveen about half an hour back. He kept on searching his daughter, but failed. Then he came to know that Md. Sahrukh son of Md. Sabbir after abducting his daughter intended to marry her. Based on the said first information report, a criminal case under Section 366A read with Section 34 IPC was registered against Md. Sabbir, Md. Sahrukh, Md. Yusuf, Md. Sajid, Ramjan Ansari and the wife of Md. Sabbir.

2. During the course of investigation, Nahida Parveen was produced before the Court of Judic
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top