SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Pat) 1272

ABHIJIT SINHA
Ranjeet Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Three of the eight persons impleaded as accused in Complaint Case No. 388 of 2004 have prayed for the quashing of the order dated 12.5.2004 passed therein by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur (East), whereby he has taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498A, 323 I.P.C. and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

2. It will not be out of place to mention here that the petitioner no. 1 is the nandosi (husband of husbands sister), petitioner no. 2 is the nanad being the wife of petitioner no. 1 and petitioner no. 3 is the unmarried nanad (husbands sister) of the complainant.

3. The complainant, Mamta Kumari, impleaded herein as O.P. No. 2, filed the aforesaid complaint on 27.4.2004 stating inter alia that her marriage with Ravi Ranjan was solemnized in the year 2003 whereat gifts worth Rs. 2 lacs and other articles worth Rs. 3 lacs were bestowed upon them. It has been alleged that a further demand of Rs. 5 lacs in cash and 2 kathas of land in the town of Muzaffarpur was subsequently demanded by the accused persons at the time of marriage but the marriage was solemnized at the intervention of the witnesses, well wishers and pleadings of her father.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top