SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Pat) 1128

R.M.LODHA, RAVI RANJAN
State Bank Of India – Appellant
Versus
Vindhwashini Devi – Respondent


Judgment

Ravi Ranjan, J.

1. Letters patent appeal is admitted.

2. Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Mishra waives service for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 (original petitioners).

3. Keeping in view the controversy that has been raised in the appeal, we are satisfied that the appeal deserves to be heard and disposed of at this stage itself.

4. We proceed accordingly.

5. Brajendra Tiwary was an employee in the State Bank of India (for short, the Bank). He died on 24thDecember, 2002. He is survived by his wife and son, who are presently respondent Nos. 1 & 2 (for short, the petitioners). The petitioners made an application for appointment of petitioner No. 2 (son) in the Bank on compassionate ground. In the application, it was stated that after the death of the employee, the family members have been put in condition of penury.

6. That at the time of death of Brajendra Tiwary, the Bank had a Scheme of appointment on compassionate ground is not in dispute. It is also not in dispute that the Bank had superseded its Scheme of appointment on compassionate ground by Page 2988 the Scheme of Payment of Ex-Gratia Lumpsum Amount in lieu of appointment on compassionate ground with effect from 4thAugust, 2005.

7. The c
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top