PATNA HIGH COURT
Navin Sinha, J.
Shah Azad Siddiqui
Versus
State Of Bihar
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4441 of 2005 ;
Decided On : JULY 31, 2008
Voluntary Retirement - Government Service - Rule 74(b)(i) of the Bihar Service Code - Rule 1802(B) of the Indian Railways Establishment Code - Rule 16 of the All India Services (Death-cum-Retirement) Rules, 1958 - The judgment discusses the interpretation and application of Rule 74(b)(i) of the Bihar Service Code, Rule 1802(B) of the Indian Railways Establishment Code, and Rule 16 of the All India Services (Death-cum-Retirement) Rules, 1958. It emphasizes the automatic cessation of the master and servant relationship upon the expiry of the notice period for voluntary retirement, the requirement of acceptance by the government, and the absence of duties after the notice period as key factors influencing the court's decision.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought voluntary retirement from Government service and submitted an application on 16.3.1998. The authorities did not communicate express acceptance of the retirement, and later initiated departmental proceedings against the petitioner. The court considered whether the petitioner was deemed to have retired upon the expiry of the notice period and if departmental proceedings could be initiated against him.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the petitioner was deemed to have voluntarily retired from service on 30.6.1998, and therefore, the initiation of departmental proceedings against him was null and void.
Issues: The issues revolved around the interpretation of Rule 74(b)(i) of the Bihar Service Code, the requirement of acceptance for voluntary retirement, and the validity of departmental proceedings initiated after the notice period.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the automatic cessation of the master and servant relationship upon the expiry of the notice period for voluntary retirement, the requirement of acceptance by the government, and the absence of duties after the notice period as key factors influencing its decision.
Final Decision: The writ application was allowed, and the petitioner was deemed to have voluntarily retired on 30.6.1998. The petitioner was entitled to his service benefits, and disputed claims for arrears of salary and promotion were to be decided separately.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The question for consideration presently is, if the petitioner shall be deemed to have retired from Government service in pursuance of his application for voluntary retirement dated 16.3.1998 under Rule 74(b)(i) of the Bihar Service Code upon expiry of three months notice period i.e. 30.6.1998. If that be so, can the authorities by not communicating express acceptance of the same contend that the petitioner continued in service and, therefore, a decision to initiate departmental proceedings could be initiated against him on 13.4.2000 and memo of charges be issued on that basis to him on 8.7.2004 on the premise that he continued in Government service.
Rule 74(b)(i) reads as follows: "Notwithstanding anything contained in the preceding sub-rule a Government servant may, after giving at least three months previous notice, in writing, to the appointing authority concerned retire from service on the date on which such a Government servant completes thirty years of qualifying service or attains fifty years of age or on any date thereafter to be specified in the notice: Provided that no Government servant under suspension shall retire from service except with the specific approval of the Government."
3. On the date that the petitioner submitted this request for voluntary retirement he was neither under suspension and no departmental proceedings were pending against him and neither was that the position in the three months period contemplated under the Rules.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon a decision of the Supreme Court reported in Union of India and Others V/s. Sayed Muzaffar Mir, 1995 Supp1 SCC 76 to submit that the denial of automatic termination of the relationship of master and servant on expiry of the notice period of three months for voluntary retirement under the Rules could be denied only in case when Government servant was under suspension or was suspended during the notice period. That the Government was always at liberty to deny this request for voluntary retirement in between this period of three months, but if the Government did not do so, the effect would be automatic cessation of master and servant relationship after the expiry of the notice period. Under consideration was Rule 1802(B) of the Indian Railways Establishment Code which permitted an employee to seek retirement by three months prior notice unless the concerned employee be under suspension and which was also interpreted to include a denial of such right during the notice period.
5. To the same effect is the judgment of the Hon ble Supreme Court reported in (2003)3 Supreme Court Cases 393 (P. Lal v/s. Union of India and Others). In that case an argument was made on behalf of the said employees that acceptance of voluntary retirement was necessary and mere expiry of three months period would not suffice. The provisions of Rule 16 of the All India Services (Death-cum-Retirement) Rules, 1958 at sub-clause 2 and 2(A) fell for consideration and which are similar to Rule 74(b)(i) of the Bihar Service Code presently under consideration. The Rule reads as follows:
"16. Superannuation gratuity or pension. (1) A member of the service shall be required compulsorily to retire from the service with effect from the afternoon of the last day of the month in which he attains the age of 58 years: Provided that he may be retained in service after the last day of the month in which he attains the age of 58 years on public grounds which, shall be recorded in writing (a) for an aggregate period not exceeding six months by the State Government; and
(b) for any period beyond six months, with the sanction of the Central Government: Provided further that a member of the service shall not be retained in service beyond the age of 60 years except in very special circumstances.
* * *
(2) A member of the service may, after giving at least three months previous notice in writin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.