Abhijit Sinha, J.

1. Both these cases were directed to be heard together with Cr.W.J.C. No. 613 of 2007 since the two revision petitions arise out of the same Complaint Case No. 1751(C) of 2005 and the writ petition arises out of Shri Krishnapuri P.S. Case No. 82 of 2005 by one of the accused of the complaint case, namely, P.S. Kansal in respect of the same cause of action. However, the two revisions were heard on 22.10.2008, whereas the writ petition was heard separately on 10.12.2008 and in my opinion since the matter involved are not the same, I am of the opinion that the order in the writ petition is required to be passed independently and separate from the orders in the revisions. In the aforesaid circumstances while separate orders shall be passed in respect of Cr.W.J.C. No. 613 of 2007, this order shall govern the two revisions which have been heard together on 22.10.2008.

2. The petitioner of Cr. Revision No. 138 of 2006 and the petitioner of Cr. Revision No. 140 of 2006, namely, Hiremagalur Parthsarthy Shamala @ H.P. Shamla @ A Shyamla and Kshitish Chandra Das @ K.C. Das respectively, both of whom along with others have been made to figure as accused in the afores