SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Pat) 998

PATNA HIGH COURT
Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.
Vinod Kumar Paswan
Versus
State Of Bihar
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3322 of 2009
Decided On : JULY 29, 2009

Headnote:Service Law-Compassionate appointment-Petitioner being eldest son of the deceased employee applied for compassionate appointment-While the matter was being considered-Respondent No.5 alleged that the deceased employee had converted himself into a Muslim and then contracted second marriage with her and from that second marriage as Muslim he had nine additional children-They were also entitled to compassionate appointment-Compassionate appointment cannot be split up into different appointments- The authority at the Electricity Board now required to get a Succession Certificate-A Succession Certificate is granted in respect of debts and security of the deceased in terms of Section 373 of Indian Succession Act and is limited to debt and security of the deceased-Neither the compassionate appointment is a debt nor security-Board is directed to consider the application of the petitioner for compassionate appointment.

JUDGEMENT

1. It is not in dispute that the petitioner is the son of late Bishwanath Paswan, who was an employee of the Bihar State Electricity Board and died in harness. It is also not in dispute that he is the eldest child of the said Bishwanath Paswan. On death of Bishwanath Paswan in harness, petitioner applied for compassionate appointment. While the matter was being considered, private respondent no. 5 Most. Aisha Khatoon applied on behalf of her nine children alleging that the said Bishwanath Paswan had converted himself into a Muslim and then contracted second marriage with her and from that second marriage as Muslim he had nine additional children. They were also entitled to compassionate appointment. The authority of the Electricity Board now required the petitioner to get a Succession Certificate even though to their knowledge it was the son and therefore normally the eldest son is entitled to compassionate appointment. Compassionate appointment cannot be split up into different appointments. There can be only one such appointment. Further a Succession Certificate is granted in respect of debts and security of the deceased in terms of Section 373 of the Indian Succession Act and is limited to debt and security of the deceased. Neither the compassionate appointment is a debt nor security for which any Succession Certificate can be granted by any Court in this country.

2. Learned counsel for private respondent no. 5 submits that the right of Muslim widow cannot be defeated. All I can say is a person contracting second marriage and that too by converting to Muslim does show at his own peril.

3. In view of the position being settled that normally the eldest son is entitled to compassionate appointment, I am left with no option but to direct the respondent- Board immediately to consider the application of the petitioner for compassionate appointment and if otherwise fit in law the appointment shall be conveyed to him to the exclusion of all others.

4. With the above observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top