SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Pat) 928

NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
Vijoy Prakash – Appellant
Versus
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. The present writ application has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the order dated 29.5.2003, passed by the Chairman- cum-Managing Director, New India Assurance Company Limited, by which the petitioners memorial/representation against the orders passed by the Disciplinary Authority and the Appellate Authority have been affirmed. By the aforesaid order the petitioner has been punished by reduction of his basic pay-scale salary by three stages. The only ground taken for quashing the aforesaid punishment is that the Central Bureau of Investigation after conducting investigation having decided not to prosecute the petitioner, the departmental proceedings for the same charge could not be sustained.

2. In order to appreciate the contention brief facts are relevant. At the relevant time the petitioner was an Assistant in the New India Assurance Company Limited in the Divisional Office No. 2 at Dak Bungalow Road, Patna. It appears that one Chansi Rai file an application before the Central Bureau of Investigation, Patna stating that the petitioner was asking for illegal gratification for securing job for the younger brother of the said Chansi Rai on Class-IV post in the










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top