Abhijit Sinha, J.

1. The three of the FIR named accused of Bahadurpur, P.S.Case No. 96 of 2006 have prayed for the quashing of the order dated 25.5.2007 passed therein by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, whereby he has taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498, 406, 379/34, IPC and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

2. One Shahista Usmani, the complainant, impleded herein as Opp.Party No.2. filed Complaint Case No. 625 of 2006 inter alia alleging commission of offences under Sections 498, 406, 379/34, IPC and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act at the hands of the accused continuously from 20.6.2004. The said complaint was transmitted to the concerned Police Station under Section 156(3), Cr PC on the basis whereof instant complaint case came registered.

3. Briefly stated the prosecution case in brief is that the complainant/informant was married, to Hasnain Azim on 28.6.2004 and Mahar was fixed at Rs. 1,11,786/-. Several ornaments of gold and silver worth Rs. 86,000/- was given to her and since the complainant had received training in computer, her brother had presented her with a computer worth Rs. 26,000/-. The first month in the matrimonial home was s