NAVIN SINHA
Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Advocate General on behalf of the Commission and learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner, who was a candidate for 47th combined preliminary examination conducted by the Bihar Public Service Commission, came to this Court earlier in CWJC No. 2404 of 2007. This Court on 16.4.2007 declined interference noticing the challenge that the number of vacancies for backward class community was far less than required by law. That the petitioner has right to move under the Right to Information Act was an issue between him and the statutory authorities under the Right to Information Act. He thereafter came in Civil Review No. 157 of 2007 making out a new case that the cut off marks for backward class candidates and general category candidates were same. The Review Court declined interference. However, liberty was given for filing a fresh writ application.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that liberty was given for filing a fresh writ petition in Civil Review No. 157 of 2007 and that CWJC No. 5802 of 2007 on a similar issue was pending consideration. He, thus, submits that the present writ application may be heard
Home Plantations Ltd. V/s. Talaku Land Board, Peermada And Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.