SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Pat) 320

RAMESH KUMAR DATTA
Arbind Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. The contempt application has been filed for initiating a contempt proceeding against opposite party No.2 (Dinesh Kumar Lal) for violating the order dated 20.3.2002 of this Court passed in the connected writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No. 2089/2002.

2. The allegation of the petitioner is that even though the maintenance of status quo by all the parties was ordered by this Court on 20.3.2002 and notice was issued and served upon opposite party No.2 during the month of April, 2002, yet he alongwith others started construction over the land which is still continuing.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner informed the Officer-in-charge of Khodawanpur Police Station on 24.8.2002 and thereafter he filed a petition on 27.8.2002 before the S.D.O., Mazaul, Begusarai, yet the opposite party No.2 has continued with the construction work.

4. In a supplementary affidavit sworn on 7.7.2008, the petitioner has again asserted that on 19.4.2008, the opposite party No.2 started collecting materials for starting construction on the land, which is the subject matter in the writ petition. On learning about the same, the petitioner sent an information on 23.4.2008 to the S.D.O. Mazaul in this







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top