SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Pat) 12

NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
Pawan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. The two petitioners, in these writ petitions, raise a common question of law and with the consent of the parties, the cases have been taken up together for final disposal at this stage itself.

2. Respondent-Bihar State Food & Civil Supply Corporation Limited, whose actions are in challenge, have appeared and filed a counter affidavit.

3. The two petitioners in the two writ petitions, are Transporting and Handling Agents. A notice inviting tender was issued by the respondent-Bihar State Food & Civil Supply Corporation Limited for appointment of Transporting and Handling Agent in respect of district Khagaria revenue district. The two writ petitioners applied but their tenders came to be rejected on the ground that there were criminal cases pending against them. This action was based upon clause (6) of the notice inviting tender, which provides that such a tenderer, who had been blacklisted by the Corporation or against whom criminal cases were pending, would not be considered competent for tender. It is substantially the validity of such a clause that is in challenge.

4. Mr. N.K. Agrawal and Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned Senior Counsel appearing in support of the writ peti







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top