NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
Pawan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
1. The two petitioners, in these writ petitions, raise a common question of law and with the consent of the parties, the cases have been taken up together for final disposal at this stage itself.
2. Respondent-Bihar State Food & Civil Supply Corporation Limited, whose actions are in challenge, have appeared and filed a counter affidavit.
3. The two petitioners in the two writ petitions, are Transporting and Handling Agents. A notice inviting tender was issued by the respondent-Bihar State Food & Civil Supply Corporation Limited for appointment of Transporting and Handling Agent in respect of district Khagaria revenue district. The two writ petitioners applied but their tenders came to be rejected on the ground that there were criminal cases pending against them. This action was based upon clause (6) of the notice inviting tender, which provides that such a tenderer, who had been blacklisted by the Corporation or against whom criminal cases were pending, would not be considered competent for tender. It is substantially the validity of such a clause that is in challenge.
4. Mr. N.K. Agrawal and Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned Senior Counsel appearing in support of the writ peti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.