SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Pat) 264

ABHIJIT SINHA
Deepak Jain – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. Heard M/s Kumar Madhurendra & Gopal Govind Mishra, the learned counsel for the petitioner, M/s S.C. Mitra and Sudhir Kumar Raj, the learned counsel for O.P. Nos. 2 and 3 and Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhaya, the learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. By this application the petitioner who happens to be the Deputy General Manager (Sales) Hindustan Motors Ltd., one of the accused of Complaint Case No. 2134 (C) of 2005 has prayed for the quashing of the entire proceeding arising therefrom including the order dated 2.6.2006 passed therein by Sri S.K. Mishra, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna, whereby he had taken cognizance of offence under Sections 403, 418 and 120B IPC and had also issued non- bailable warrants of arrest.

3. It appears that the Hindustan Motor Limited (hereinafter referred to as "the Company") entered into an agreement with the complainant M/s Aayushee Media Consultant (hereinafter referred to as "the complainant") for publication of certain advertisements in newspapers and the complainant carried out their part of the agreement but the payment therefor was allegedly not made. Eventually certain sums of the outstanding amount was paid by the Company and for the bala



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top