SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Pat) 282

NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
Suraj Kana Pharmaceutical – Appellant
Versus
Bihar State Financial Corporation – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. Counter-affidavit has been filed by the Bihar State Financial Corporation. The petitioner deems it not necessary to file a rejoinder as basic facts, as alleged in the writ petition, stand admitted. With consent of parties, the writ petition is being disposed of at this stage itself.

2. Petitioner has come to this Court against action sought to be taken by the Corporation to sell about 5 kathas of land at Digha in Patna belonging to one of the partners of the petitioners firm which was mortgaged to the Corporation to secure the financial accommodation.

3. The petitioner-firm consisted of three partners. They were all new entrepreneurs who were allured into setting up a small scale industry unit at Digha, Patna. They applied for term loan to the Corporation and the Corporation, it is not disputed, after project appraisal, sanctioned a term loan of Rs. 13.06 lacs vide sanction letter dated 22- 5-1990. The project appraisal report and the sanction letter is.Annexure-1 to the writ application. Pursuant to the aforesaid sanction, petitioner and his partners were asked to create mortgage for securing the loan to be disbursed and in the said mortgage, one of the partners gave 5












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top