PATNA HIGH COURT
Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.
Rajeev Ran Vijay Kumar Son Of Late Kamleshwar Kumar Singh
Versus
State Of Bihar
CWJC No. 10795 of 2006
Decided On : April 30, 2009
Compassionate Appointment - Government Post - The court directed the authorities to appoint the petitioner on an appropriate post in the Government as per the recommendation of the District Compassionate Committee.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's case for compassionate appointment in the Education Department was recommended by the District Compassionate Committee, but the authorities forced the petitioner to accept an appointment that was not under the Government as per the Circular Letter issued by the Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was not given appointment on compassionate grounds in the Government as recommended by the District Compassionate Committee and as per the Government Circulars.
Issues: Forced appointment on non-government post, violation of government circulars
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the Circular Letter issued by the Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, which clearly stated that the post of Prakhand/Panchayat Shikshak is not a post under the Government and directed the authorities to appoint the petitioner on an appropriate post in the Government as per the recommendation of the District Compassionate Committee.
Final Decision: The writ application was allowed, and the respondent-authorities were directed to appoint the petitioner on an appropriate post in the Government as per the recommendation of the District Compassionate Committee within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the court's order.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.C. to A.A.G.-III for the State.
2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment in the Education Department was recommended by the District Compassionate Committee at its meeting held on 7.12.2005 considering that the petitioners father was a teacher in a Government School. Pursuant to the same, the authorities wrote a letter to the petitioner that he may be given appointment as a Prakhand/ Panchayat Shikshak. The petitioner exercised his option for the same and accordingly, joined on the post of Prakhand Shikshak in Koelwar.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the authorities have wrongly forced the petitioner to accept such appointment, which is not an appointment under the Government as has been clearly laid down in the Circular Letter No. 6905 dated 17.10.2008 issued by the Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Government of Bihar. In the said Circular, which has been annexed as Annexure-2 to the supplementary affidavit, it is stated that the post of Prakhand/Panchayat Shikshak is not a post under the Government and the District Compassionate Committees have been directed not to make any recommendation for appointment on such post as it was beyond their jurisdiction.
4. In view of that clear directions issued in the aforesaid Circular letter of the Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, it is evident that the petitioner has not been given appointment on compassionate ground in the Government as was recommended by the District Compassionate Committee in its meeting dated 7.12.2005 and as per the requirement of the Government Circulars.
5. The writ application is, accordingly, allowed and the respondent-authorities are directed to appoint the petitioner on an appropriate post in the Government as per the recommendation of the District Compassionate Committee within a period of two months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.