SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Pat) 592

SHEEMA ALI KHAN
Md. Mojahid @ Mujahid – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

SHEEMA ALI KHAN, J.

1. This appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 17th May, 2004 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. V, Saharsa by which the appellant has been convicted to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code and also to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The First Information Report was instituted by Md. Aijul, the father of the deceased lady Sajda Khatoon and the informant of this case alleging therein that he heard rumors that her daughter was killed by her in-laws and, therefore, he aiongwith Sk. Niyamat Ali, Md. Izhar, Md. Firoj and Mir Khwaja went to the village Palrahi where the deceased was living with her husband and in-laws and came to know that her daughter was missing from the house of her in-laws. Therefore, he went to the Police Station and lodged this First Information Report.

3. Altogether five witnesses have been examined in this case. Out of the five witnesses, PW-3 Karamat Ali Mia and PW- 4 Abdul Kuddus are not named in the First Information Report. The Investigating Officer has not been examined in this case an












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top