SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Pat) 665

MIHIR KUMAR JHA, DIPAK MISRA
Vandana Govindam D/o Sri Dinesh Prasad Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. Having heard counsel for the parties as also upon taking into account the facts and circumstances mentioned in this application, the delay of 11 days in filing of this appeal is condoned.

2. I.A. No. 3388 of 2010 is allowed. L.P.A. No. 650 of 2010

3. In view of the fact that we have condoned the delay in filing of this appeal, we are also inclined to dispose of this appear on merits at the stage of admission itself.

4. We have accordingly heard Mr. Abhay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for, the appellant-writ petitioner and Sri Saket Tiwari, J.C. to G.P.16 for the State.

5. In this intra-court appeal the appellant-writ petitioner has assailed the order of the learned Single Judge dated 16.2.2010 in C.W.J.C. No. 14572 of 2007, whereby and whereunder, her prayer for quashing of the corrigendum dated 23rd October, 2007 issued by the Bihar Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the B.P.S.C.) cancelling her result of the Child Development Project Officer Examination, 2005, has been rejected.

6. From the materials on record, it is apparent that the appellant-writ petitioner had filed her application in response to the Advertisement No. 34 of 2005 issued by the B.P










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top