SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Pat) 692

MANDHATA SINGH
Shankar Jee @ Chhatish Singh @ Bigra Singh @ satish Singh, S/o Late Hridya Nand Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Petitioner is, if major, an accused for the offence under Section 302/34 of the I.P.C. in Murar P.S. Case No. 36 of 2007. A claim was made on his behalf in Trial Court about his being juvenile. Enquiry was also conducted. Several documents including horoscope, Admit Card, Transfer Certificate of the School (verified by original register) in which he has been shown failed in matriculation examination are filed in the case.

3. Oral witnesses are there also on the point of age including a report from duly constituted Medical Board. Opinion of the Medical Board is about being petitioner 21 years on 3.2.2010 showing more than 18 years on the date of occurrence i.e. 29.9.2007. A single legal point is raised and pressed that opinion of the Medical Board can be obtained in absence of matriculation or equivalent certificate, certificate from the first attended School (other than play school) and certificate from Municipal Corporation or Municipal Authority or Panchayat. Transfer Certificate filed on behalf of the petitioner followed by admit card concerning appearance in matriculation examination of t


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top