Rakesh Kumar, J.

1. Yesterday, when the case was called out, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to press this petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. However, as a last indulgence, the case was adjourned for the day with an indication that if on the next day, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner, the case shall be decided on the basis of materials available on the record even in absence of learned counsel for the petitioner. While adjourning the case by its order dated 13.5.2010, it was recorded that in this case, the interim order of stay is still continuing since 29.2.2000 and it appears that after obtaining the order of stay, the petitioner has lost interest in the present case and due to that reason none has come forward to press this petition.

2. Today again when the case was called out, none has come forward to press this petition.

3. The sole petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Sec.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , has prayed for quashing of the order dated 9.7.1999 passed by Shri V. K. Jain, Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in Complaint Case No.315 (C) of 1999/1173 T. R. Of 1999. By the said order, the lear