SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Pat) 1254

PATNA HIGH COURT
Navin Sinha and Dinesh Kumar Singh JJ.
Rajendra Prasad
Versus
State Of Bihar
CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 1194 of 1993
Decided On : MAY 12, 2010

The court emphasized the principle of non-discrimination and directed the consideration of the petitioners' claim for promotion, highlighting the grant of necessary consequential benefits from the date of promotion.

Headnote:

Promotion - Hostile Discrimination - The court directed the consideration of the petitioners' claim for promotion to the post of senior selection grade, highlighting the allegations of hostile discrimination and ordering the grant of necessary consequential benefits from the date of promotion.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought consideration for promotion to the post of senior selection grade with retrospective effect from 1.4.1981, alleging hostile discrimination in comparison to a junior colleague who had been granted senior selection grade with retrospective effect from 1.4.1986.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the writ petition with a direction for the consideration of the petitioners' claim for promotion within a maximum period of four months, emphasizing the grant of necessary consequential benefits from the date of promotion.

Issues: Allegations of hostile discrimination, consideration of the petitioners' claim for promotion, and grant of necessary consequential benefits.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for the consideration of the petitioners' claim for promotion, particularly in light of the allegations of hostile discrimination, and directed the grant of necessary consequential benefits from the date of promotion.

Final Decision: The writ application was disposed of with a direction for the consideration of the petitioners' claim for promotion within a maximum period of four months and the grant of necessary consequential benefits from the date of promotion.

JUDGEMENT

Navin Sinha and Dinesh Kumar Singh, JJ.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The claim in the writ application is to be considered for promotion to the post of senior selection grade with effect from 1.4.1981. The petitioners claim to be appointed as Lower Division Clerks on different dates in the Patna Medical College Hospital at Patna. It is their further case that they passed the Accounts examination and were promoted to the post of Upper Division Clerks. They were then granted the junior selection grade on 31.12.1983 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1981. It is further alleged that while one Awadh Kishore Sharma, junior to them has been granted senior selection grade with retrospective from 1.4.1986 by order dated 24.07.1990, the petitioners have been subjected to hostile discrimination. Learned counsel for the State points out that in their representation, the petitioners themselves have claimed senior selection grade with effect from 1986 and not from 1981 as pleaded in the writ application. Learned counsel for the petitioners counter the submission to urge that the petitioners claimed senior selection grade from prior to 1.4.1986.

2. The counter affidavit of the respondents is hardly of any help in adjudication. There is no denial to the specific allegations of hostile discrimination in paragraph 12 and 16 of the writ application dealt with in paragraphs 13 and 14 of the counter affidavit. On the contrary the counter affidavit states that the case of the petitioners is under consideration and certain more information from connected Offices is required and that their case for promotion could not be finalized for lack of full information. Learned counsel for the parties are not in a position to inform this Court as to what developments have taken place in the mean time and whether the relief has been granted to the petitioners or not and, if so, from what date.

3. The writ petition is disposed off with the direction that, if the case of the petitioners for grant of senior selection grade including the allegations of hostile discrimination has not been considered till date, let it be so done within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before respondent no.3. It is expected that the appropriate orders for payment of necessary consequential benefits from the date of promotion shall also be made. If the case of the petitioners has already been considered and promotions granted, no further action shall be required on the part of the respondents under the present order. The writ application stands disposed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top