SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Pat) 2514

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mridula Mishra and Dharnidhar Jha JJ.
Shankar Sahni
Versus
State Of Bihar
Criminal Appeal No. 556 of 2009 566 of 2009 648 of 2009 665 of 2009 709 of 2009 710 of 2009
Decided On : NOVEMBER 19, 2010

Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860-Sections 414, 149 and Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985Section 21(b), Arms Act-Section 25(1-A) 25(1-AA), 25(1-B)A, 26(1) and 35 and Antiquities Art Treasure Act, 1972-Section 25(2)-Conviction and sentence under-No evidence regarding seizure of prohibited arms, ammunitions, heroin and antique idols in presence of independent seizure list witnesses-The special messenger, who carried the sample to FSL has not been examined as witness to explain the delay of 22 days between the dispatch and receiving the sample by the FSL-The FSL report does not disclose that what was the percentage of Heroin and glucose-There is no document on record in support of the ownership of the vehicle-Indica car from which prohibited arms and ammunition as well as psychotropic substance is alleged to have been recovered was not seized, its driver was not interrogated and apprehended-There being complete absence of evidence on record proving charge under Section 21(b) of NDPS Act-Hence finding recorded by trial court is not sustainable and fit to be set aside-No documents have been brought on record to prove that arms recovered from Dikky of the car were prohibited arms-There is no oral evidence to show that apprehended persons actually had knowledge of prohibited arms kept in Dikky of the car-In absence of such evidence conviction of the appellants under Section 25 (I-A) of Arms Act is perverse and fit to be set aside-There was no sanction for prosecution initiation of criminal proceeding against the accused appellants under the provision of Antiquities and Art Treasures Act itself was illegal and without jurisdiction-There is no documentary proof that the seized articles were the articles registered for its antiquity-Appellants could not be convicted and punished under section 25(2) of the Act-charge, framed against the appellants is not sustainable-It is set aside-All appellants are directed to be released forthwith.

JUDGEMENT

Mridula Mishra, J.

1. All appellants were charged under Sections 414, 149 of the Indian Penal Code, under Section 21(b) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Sections 25(1-A), 25(1-AA), 25(1-B)A, 26(i) and 35 of the Arms Act and also under Section 25(2) of the Antiquities Art Treasure Act, 1972. The appellants have been convicted by the judgment and order dated 1.6.2009/8.6.2009 respectively passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Banka in Banka P.S. Case No. 291 of 2005 (G.R. Case No. 1055 of 2005) and have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years for conviction under Sections 414, 149 of the Indian Penal Code, R.I. for ten years and fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine R.I. for two years for conviction under Section 21(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act. The appellants have further been sentenced R.I. for ten years and fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default of payment of fine R.I. for one year for conviction under Section 25(1-A) read with Section 35 of the Arms Act. They have also been sentenced R.I. for life and fine of Rs. 10,000/-, in default of payment of fine R.I. for one year for conviction under Section 25(1-AA) read with Section 35 of the Arms Act and for their conviction under Section 25(1-B)A, read with Section 35 of the Arms Act R.I. for three years and fine of Rs. 5,000/- in default of payment of fine R.I. for six months. The appellants have also been sentenced to undergo R.I. for seven years each and fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default of payment of fine R.I. for six months for their conviction under Section 25(2) of the Antiquities Art and Treasure Act, 1972. The appellants have preferred these appeals against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the trial Court.

2. Shri D.K. Sinha, Officer In-charge of Banka Police Station was informed on Telephone by the Superintendent of Police, Banka at about 12.30 A.M. on 13.9.2005, since he received secret information that a gang of smugglers is traveling by road, through Katoria and going to Deoghar with huge amount of ancient antiquities, arms, ammunitions and Heroin. These articles, they are carrying from Bhagalpur to Calcutta, which will be handed over to the International gang of smugglers. The Officer In-charge of Banka P.S. was informed by the Superintendent of Police that the gang of smuggler can pass through Katoria road at any time in the night, as such an action is needed to be taken to apprehend them and for that a raiding party be formed under the leadership of Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Banka. Sri D.K. Sinha, Officer In-charge of Banka P.S. (P.W. 8) made a station diary entry and proceeded from the police station with constable No. 156 (Driver) towards the residence of Sub-Divisional Police Officer, where Officer In-charge of Barahat P.S. Raj Kishore Singh (P.W. 10), Security Guards of the Superintendent of Police, Banka, Constable No. 39 Satyendra Kumar Yadav (P.W. 5), Constable No. 74 Dipak Kumar (P.W. 6), Constable No. 62 Abinash Kumar Jha (P.W. 7) and Constable No. 336 Sajan Kumar (P.W. 9) also came. The raiding party headed by Baliram Kumar Choudhary, Sub-Divisional Police Officer (not examined) proceeded at 1.30 A.M. and reached near a pulia situated half kilometers away from Village-Kakwara. The police party started checking the vehicles passing through that road and at about 3 A.M. a Tata Indica Car bearing registration No. WB-02J-9829 came there, which was asked to stop. The car stopped but the passengers sitting inside the car tried to flee away, they were chased and apprehended by the police party. All six persons sitting inside the vehicles were apprehended and on interrogation disclosed their names. They were Kumod Mandal, Lallan Kumar Mandal, Mukesh Kumar Jha, Suman Kumar Singh, Rajendra Das and Md. Imran. Mukhiya of Village-Kakwara, Upendra Narain Singh (not examined) alongwith some villagers also came there and in presence of two witnesses, namely, Upendra Narayan



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top