SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Pat) 2612

R.M.DOSHIT, JYOTI SARAN
Brajesh Chandra Mishra (In Both) – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. (Per: Honble the Chief Justice) With the consent of learned Advocates this Appeal is heard and decided today.

2. This Appeal preferred under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent arises from the judgment and order dated 27th September, 2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in above C.W.J.C. No. 5795 of 2010*.

3. The subject matter of this litigation is the selection of the appellant by Indian Oil Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation1), for L.P.G. distributorship in Gopalganj District. Pursuant to the advertisement published by the Corporation several persons including the writ petitioner and the appellant applied for such distributorship. The appellant was selected and issued a letter of intent. In the select list, the writ petitioner was at SI. No. 2. Feeling aggrieved by the selection of the appellant, the writ petitioner approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution in above C.W.J.C. No. 5795 of 2010*. According to the writ petitioner the appellant could not have been selected as he did not have requisite experience of dealing in petroleum products. Nevertheless, the appellant was granted 2.5 marks under the head experience giving him an


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top