SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Pat) 2554

MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
Smt. Radhika Devi – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Kumar Sharma – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.

1. The defendant Nos. 1 and 2 have filed this First Appeal against the judgment and Order dated 29.6.2005 passed by Sri Prakash Chandra Gupta, 7th Addl. District Judge, Gaya in Title Suit No. 18 of 1999/2 of 1994 allowing the application for probate and letters of administration filed by respondent No.1.

2. The respondent No.1, Ajay Kumar Sharma filed the aforesaid title suit under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act alleging that late Fateh Bahadur Singh, the father of the plaintiff died on 14.5.1991 at Gaya leaving a registered Will in favour of the plaintiff dated 13.5.1981 duly executed and attested. The plaintiff also averred that the value of the property which may come to him is Rs. 2,32,758/- Most of the property are within the jurisdiction of Gaya Court. Both the attesting witnesses are dead but the scribe Chandrika Prasad is still alive. The Will was annexed with the application.

3. The appellants filed separate objection to the said application. The brother of Ajay Kumar Sharma, namely, Bishnu Kumar Sharma and wife namely, Lalima Devi filed another objection. The other brother, Dr. Virendra Kumar Sharma who is appellant No. 2 as stated













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top