SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Pat) 2096

MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
Sadanand Prasad @ Biresh – Appellant
Versus
Rukmini Devi – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.

1. This first appeal has been filed under the provisions of Hindu Marriage Act by the husband-appellant against the judgment and decree dated 11.11.2004 passed by Sri Krishori Ram, the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No. 1, Nalanda in Matrimonial Case No. 25 of 2000 dismissing the appellants case for divorce.

2. The petitioner-appellant filed the aforesaid Matrimonial Case No. 25 of 2000 praying for a decree of divorce against his wife, the opposite party-respondent on the ground of cruelty, desertion and mental disorder.

3. According to the appellant his case in short is that his marriage with O.P. respondent was solemnized in the year 1990 in the village Rahui. Second marriage i.e. Ruksadi was performed in 1993. Thereafter his wife went to matrimonial home. She never lived in harmony with the appellant and started quarrelling with the family members and also with the petitioner, causing mental torture to the appellant-husband. Regularly she used to leave the matrimonial house without consent of the family members. In spite of the appellants persuasion to her to abstain from her conduct, she did not obey. Inspite of appellants requ








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top