SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Pat) 2330

RAKESH KUMAR
Rajmani Prasad Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

Rakesh Kumar, J.

1. Two petitioners, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have prayed for quashing of entire prosecution in Complaint Case No. 2035-C of 2005 as well as order dated 27.9.2006 passed by Shri D.L.Prasad, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Begusarai. By the said order, learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of offence under Sections 323, 500, 190, 199, 218, 203, 200, 168 and 420 read with 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Short fact of the case is that the opposite party No. 2 filed a complaint in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, which was numbered as Complaint Case No. 2035-C of 2005, against three accused persons including two petitioners, who are before this Court. It was alleged that the son of complainant was student of G.D. College, Begusarai in the course of B.Sc. (Honours) for the Sessions 1999-02. It was alleged that despite the fact that the son of complainant had appeared in Part-III examination, his result was un-authorizedly held up and thereafter, illegal gratification was demanded for publishing the result of son of the complainant and similarly situated other st




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top