SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Pat) 2196

RAKESH KUMAR
Thengu Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

Rakesh Kumar, J.

1. Four petitioners, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have prayed for quashing of an order dated 8.9.2003 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Bhojpur at Arrah in Cr. Revision No. 154 of 2003. By the said order revision preferred by the petitioners against the order of cognizance dated 2.6.2003 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 2nd Class, Arrah in complaint case No. 241 (C) of 2002/Tr. No. 1222 of 2003 arising out of Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 182 of 2001 was rejected.

2. Short fact of the case is that the opposite party No. 2 had filed a written report before the Officer-in-charge, Jagdishpur Police Station, disclosing therein that on 17.9.2001 in the night at 12.00, the petitioner No. 1 Thengu Singh had looted certain articles like Battary of the Tractor of the informant, Dynamo etc. from the vehicle of the informant. The reason of commission of such occurrence was mentioned that a case was going on in between the informant and petitioner No. 1 and on the date of filing of the FIR, date was fixed for examination of witness. With a view to frighten the complainant from not producing an





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top